Peningkatan Kapasitas Masyarakat Desa Gema Dalam Pengawasan Mutu Infrastruktur Melalui Bimbingan Teknis Berbasis Partisipatif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58466/j6pg4929Keywords:
community empowerment, nonformal education, PKM, quality control, rural infrastructureAbstract
Gema Village, located in Simpang Dua District, Ketapang Regency, has significant potential in agriculture and plantation sectors but faces challenges in infrastructure quality control. This Community Service Program (PKM) aims to strengthen the technical capacity of village officials and the community in conducting effective, transparent, and sustainable construction quality supervision. The implementation methods include quality policy socialization, case-based technical training, application of on-site quality checklist systems, direct mentoring during construction activities, and performance-based evaluation. The results indicate a notable improvement in technical knowledge (from 54.3% to 79.4%), ability to create quality checklists (from 35% to 85%), and participant satisfaction (92%). The Village Empowerment Institution (LPM) is now capable of performing independent and documented quality control. The study concludes that nonformal education-based approaches significantly enhance technical literacy and infrastructure governance in rural areas. It is recommended that similar programs be conducted periodically with cross-institutional collaboration to ensure sustainability and replication of the PKM model in other villages.
Downloads
References
Burgos, A., Páez, R., Carmona, E., & Rivas, H. (2013). A systems approach to modeling community-based environmental monitoring: A case of participatory water quality monitoring in rural Mexico. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(12), 10297–10316.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Howarth, T., & Watson, P. (2012). Construction quality management: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Jakarta: Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia.
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2018). Spesifikasi Umum 2018 untuk Pekerjaan Konstruksi Jalan dan Jembatan (Revisi 2). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga.
Mono, A., & Samaloisa, R. (2022). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembangunan desa di Kalurahan Condongcatur Kapanewon Depok Kabupaten Sleman. TheJournalish: Social and Government, 3(2), 113–121.
Sahlberg, P. (2012). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Schunk, D. H. (2012a). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Schunk, D. H. (2012b). Teori-teori pembelajaran: Perspektif pendidikan (Terjemahan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Waheed, M., & Abbas, M. (2023). Foundations of a successful site quality management system. Indonesian Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 9(2), 26–33.
