Kelayakan Finansial PLTS Atap On-Grid pada Gedung Komersial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58466/m8gpe298Keywords:
rooftop solar power plant; on-grid system; financial feasibility; NPV; IRR; payback periodAbstract
This study evaluates the financial feasibility of an on-grid rooftop solar power plant implemented on a commercial building in West Java. The system is designed with a 50 kW inverter and 69 monocrystalline photovoltaic modules with a total array capacity of 34.5 kWp. The study applies a quantitative applied approach using load profile data, solar radiation data, investment cost, operation and maintenance cost, and electricity tariff as the main inputs. Financial feasibility is assessed using Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), and Payback Period, while the technical contribution is evaluated through annual energy production and bill-saving potential. The rooftop PV system produces approximately 40,296 kWh per year and reduces monthly electricity consumption by about 3,358 kWh. This output provides a monthly saving of IDR 4,851,303 and an annual economic value of IDR 58,215,631 in the first year. With an initial investment of IDR 483,000,000 and inverter replacement considered in year 11, the project generates a positive NPV of IDR 111,294,381, IRR of 13.56%, and payback period of 9.07 years. These indicators show that the project is financially feasible and supports long-term operational cost efficiency, provided that system performance and maintenance are properly managed
Downloads
References
[1] Afif MT, Martin A. Potensi energi surya dan tantangan pemanfaatan PLTS di Indonesia. J Energi Terbarukan. 2022;10(2):45-56.
[2] Sebastian R, et al. Target NDC Indonesia dan transisi energi rendah karbon. J Kebijakan Energi. 2025;14(1):1-12.
[3] Samsurizal, et al. Pengenalan sistem pembangkit listrik tenaga surya. Jakarta: Teknik Elektro Press; 2021.
[4] Presiden Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 112 Tahun 2022 tentang percepatan pengembangan energi terbarukan untuk penyediaan tenaga listrik. Jakarta; 2022.
[5] Abuk GM, Rumbino Y. Analisis kelayakan ekonomi menggunakan NPV pada proyek energi. J Ekonomi Teknik. 2020;7(1):20-29.
[6] Qomaruddin M, et al. Evaluasi IRR dan payback period pada investasi energi terbarukan. J Manaj Rekayasa. 2021;9(3):88-96.
[7] Prabawa A, Sidqi A. Standar kelayakan finansial proyek PLTS berbasis capital budgeting. J Energi dan Bisnis. 2025;12(1):34-44.
[8] Yulia R. Analisis kelayakan finansial PLTS atap pada bangunan komersial. J Rekayasa Energi Surya. 2024;8(2):70-82.
[9] Rafli M, et al. Performance ratio dan perencanaan PLTS rooftop gedung fakultas teknik. J Teknol Energi. 2022;11(2):115-126.
[10] Pawenary A, et al. Analisis LCOE sistem PLTS on-grid pada gedung perkantoran. J Teknik Elektro. 2022;16(1):50-61.
[11] Ray P, et al. Financial evaluation of industrial rooftop solar PV under equity and loan schemes. Renew Energy Finance. 2021;5(4):210-220.
[12] Syamsudin R, et al. Analisis sensitivitas investasi photovoltaic pada fasilitas publik. J Infrastruktur Energi. 2017;6(1):22-31.
[13] Dwisari N, et al. Potensi energi matahari sebagai energi alternatif di Indonesia. J Sains Terapan. 2023;9(1):15-24.
[14] Arrosyid MA, et al. Karakteristik modul fotovoltaik monokristalin untuk sistem PLTS. J Fotovoltaik Indonesia. 2024;4(2):55-64.
[15] Manihuruk P, Simbolon R. Evaluasi inverter pada sistem PLTS komersial. J Konversi Energi. 2024;13(1):77-85.
[16] Sartika D, et al. Perhitungan performance ratio pada PLTS atap. J Energi Surya. 2023;7(2):91-102.
[17] Diansyah M, et al. Proteksi DC dan AC pada instalasi PLTS atap. J Instalasi Listrik. 2021;5(3):133-142.
[18] Adi W. Levelized cost of energy untuk perbandingan teknologi pembangkit. J Ekonomi Energi. 2024;15(2):100-112.
[19] Putra TS, Prabowo E, Ramadani F. Pengaruh Overhaul Terhadap Kinerja High Pressure Heater Unit 3 PLTU Banten Lontar. JTM: JURNAL TEKNIK MESIN. 2026 Feb 1;2(1):10-5.
